UPDATED: Adelaide has made the decision to appeal Ebony Marinoff’s three-game suspension.
The Crows had the deadline to make their call extended by two hours as they worked out the best way to attack the ban on Wednesday afternoon.
They will now take the case to the AFL Appeals Board.
Story continues:
Adelaide midfielder Ebony Marinoff has been suspended for three weeks by the AFL Tribunal for careless conduct after colliding with GWS recruit Brid Stack during the club’s first practice match.
Stack was taken to hospital following the hit with fears she had suffered a serious neck or spinal injury, but the Irish import is expected to make a full recovery.
MRO Michael Christian deemed the incident careless conduct, severe impact and high contact, which saw it directly referred to the AFL Tribunal.
The ban, which sees the inaugural AFLW Rising Star suspended for a third of the upcoming season, has been widely criticised by sportspeople and fans.
Adelaide is currently in meetings determining whether they will appeal the ban.
Watch the incident below
Ebony Marinoff has been found guilty of engaging in forceful front-on contact at the AFL Tribunal tonight and has been suspended for three matches. Below is the incident in question, more to come #weflyasone #crowsaflw pic.twitter.com/3FDLg1kXmQ
— Adelaide Crows AFLW (@CrowsAFLW) January 19, 2021
Ebony Marinoff has her say following last night's tribunal decision. pic.twitter.com/n7rZydOnrk
— AFL Women's (@aflwomens) January 19, 2021
The reaction following the verdict was universally negative, with many pointing out that Marinoff’s action did not warrant such a severe ban.
Multiple key AFLW figures have privately expressed their frustration, feeling the Crows midfielder was made an example of by the AFL.
Former North Melbourne star Nick Dal Santo believes it’s another example of the AFL suspending a player because of the injury caused.
“From what I saw, she’s been given three weeks off the severity of the injury, not by the actual incident and what occurred,” Dal Santo told SEN Breakfast.
“Take the injury out of it, I don’t think there was a great deal in it. From everything I’d heard the day before and I was waiting to see the footage, it was nothing like I thought it would be.
“I thought three weeks was severe. Let’s put it this way. If Brid had have got straight up, it wouldn’t have even got a week.
“It didn’t seem that aggressive, it was within the parameters of a stoppage. It wasn’t what I was picturing when hearing about the possibility of the injury.
“Three weeks in a nine-week season, that’s severe for me. That’s the equivalent of seven weeks in the men’s season. It’s a lot.”
SEN Mornings host Julian De Stoop agreed that the ban was harsh.
“If you have a look at the incident, and obviously there was a terrible injury caused, it looked more like an accident than anything wrong that Ebony did. Accidents do happen in footy,” De Stoop told SEN Mornings.
Social media, and multiple AFL greats, were equally confused about the Tribunal’s verdict.
Suspended for 3 games of a 9 game season for this. The injury was horrific, the action that caused it was not. Crows must appeal https://t.co/j5VyVFiVCL
— Kane Cornes (@kanecornes) January 19, 2021
3 match suspension is huge considering Ebony went to tackle and didn’t bump. Yes the injury is serious but unfortunately in contact sport injuries happen. https://t.co/t8WCfBaCEf
— Warren Tredrea (@warrentredrea) January 19, 2021
Is this a joke!? I’ve seen the footage - ridiculous decision 🙄 I’d be appealing that one 👊🏼 #AFLW https://t.co/74zrMhTO27
— Megan Schutt (@megan_schutt) January 19, 2021
Sometimes accidents/unfortunate injuries happen. This was not an intentional, malicious action. That’s a third of the season. #appeal https://t.co/JqqAIcV9KW
— Graham Cornes (@Cornesy12) January 19, 2021
Harsh? Awkward accident. Both arrived at ball virtually same time, Ebony watching it whole way & about to gather til last split-second when it bounces by. Brid enters head-first. Ebony nowhere to go. Good reminder for junior coaches: teach players to turn & protect themselves. https://t.co/6z1PgNIFd9
— Jason Bennett (@JasonBennettTV) January 19, 2021
I understand there was a major injury and that clouds things, but this would have been a joke if she got one week. Three weeks is a genuine embarrassment. https://t.co/oYR4ZhUpeQ
— Andrew Johnston (@ARJ7X) January 19, 2021
THREE GAMES?! Are you taking the piss?! https://t.co/R5MhYjsUYg
— Jack Hudson (@jhudson_10) January 19, 2021
After watching the (not so great quality) vision back and forth, Stack is leading with her head, and Marinoff's arm appears to get her. Clumsy by Marinoff, but inexperience of Stack contributes. I say free kick and Marinoff fined, 1 week at worst. 3 weeks is too many. #AFLW https://t.co/EaIpcZSegx
— Peter Holden (@MrPeterHolden) January 19, 2021
Everyone hopes Brid Stack makes a fast and full recovery from her injuries.
— Paddy Sweeney (@SweeneyPaddy9) January 19, 2021
But on the evidence below, I’m not sure Ebony Marinoff deserves a 3 week ban, especially in a 9 game season. https://t.co/lEtO1G0prz
Surely the Club appeals. Being rubbed out for 1/3 of the season seems excessive https://t.co/mha3c9wdXk
— Vicki Schwarz (@VSchwarz9) January 19, 2021